I've walked throught he various license related files
common_copyright_opensuse.xml common_copyright_sle.xml common_legal.xml
in our internal and external repositories and edited them to
look more appealing. At least more appealing to me.
I am half lawyer half developer, so your milage may vary.
* The full texts of GFDL and GPL now appear exactly as written by the FSF.
There were some minor edits, that we are not entitled to do.
* The copyright line of the GFDL boiler plate now says
"(C) 2006-2010 Novell Inc. and contributors. All rights reserved."
instead of several other forms, none of which honored any non-Novell
contributors. (The term 'All rights reserved' is a nice-to-have for
layers, but has no factual effect -- it bows to the terms of the GFDL.)
* Call the licenses GPLv2, GFDLv2.1 instead just GPL and GFDL.
Dinar, I also touched some files under */ru/, where I understood the english.
Please let me know if I messed up something. Hope not :-)
o \ Juergen Weigert paint it green! __/ _=======.=======_
<V> | [hidden email] back to ascii! __/ _---|____________\/
\ | 0911 74053-508 __/ (____/ /\
(/) | _____________________________/ _/ \_ vim:set sw=2 wm=8
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]