[Tumbleweed] ucode-intel

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Tumbleweed] ucode-intel

Achim Gratz

Should there be a new package, perhaps in Updates, that rolls back the
microcode to a level that Intel currently supports?  My Haswell just
hung on boot (after running with no problems for a few days) and I had
to boot with "nopti disable_ucode_ldr" added to the kernel command line.
However, that got me back to microcode level 0x20 (the botched Intel
blob is 0x23 and I have been on 0x22 before).


Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Tumbleweed] ucode-intel

Marcus Meissner
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:13:50PM +0100, Achim Gratz wrote:
>
> Should there be a new package, perhaps in Updates, that rolls back the
> microcode to a level that Intel currently supports?  My Haswell just
> hung on boot (after running with no problems for a few days) and I had
> to boot with "nopti disable_ucode_ldr" added to the kernel command line.
> However, that got me back to microcode level 0x20 (the botched Intel
> blob is 0x23 and I have been on 0x22 before).

Yes. I just submitted a revert.

Ciao, Marcus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Tumbleweed] ucode-intel

Achim Gratz
Marcus Meissner writes:
>> Should there be a new package, perhaps in Updates, that rolls back the
>> microcode to a level that Intel currently supports?
[…]
>
> Yes. I just submitted a revert.

Thank you.


Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Tumbleweed] ucode-intel

Andrei Borzenkov
In reply to this post by Marcus Meissner
24.01.2018 21:21, Marcus Meissner пишет:

> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:13:50PM +0100, Achim Gratz wrote:
>>
>> Should there be a new package, perhaps in Updates, that rolls back the
>> microcode to a level that Intel currently supports?  My Haswell just
>> hung on boot (after running with no problems for a few days) and I had
>> to boot with "nopti disable_ucode_ldr" added to the kernel command line.
>> However, that got me back to microcode level 0x20 (the botched Intel
>> blob is 0x23 and I have been on 0x22 before).
>
> Yes. I just submitted a revert.
>
> Ciao, Marcus
>

What about Leap? What about
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074919 (which is reintroduced
by this revert)?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Tumbleweed] ucode-intel

Marcus Meissner
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:00:27PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:

> 24.01.2018 21:21, Marcus Meissner пишет:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:13:50PM +0100, Achim Gratz wrote:
> >>
> >> Should there be a new package, perhaps in Updates, that rolls back the
> >> microcode to a level that Intel currently supports?  My Haswell just
> >> hung on boot (after running with no problems for a few days) and I had
> >> to boot with "nopti disable_ucode_ldr" added to the kernel command line.
> >> However, that got me back to microcode level 0x20 (the botched Intel
> >> blob is 0x23 and I have been on 0x22 before).
> >
> > Yes. I just submitted a revert.
> >
> > Ciao, Marcus
> >
>
> What about Leap? What about
> http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074919 (which is reintroduced
> by this revert)?

In Leap I only removed it from the update servers.

i did another revert back to the November state, where 1074919 is not in.

Ciao, Marcus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]