> #### 11.4 Changes ######
> For 11.4 we completely revamped that Start-Up guide. It now consists of
> 5 chapters derived from the former quickstarts:
> * Installation
> * KDE
> * GNOME
> * LibreOffice
> * Help & Troubleshooting
> The first 3 chapters have been shipped as separate Quickstart with
> former openSUSE versions (filenames are the same as before). The
> LibreOffoce part is new, the Help & Troubleshooting remains in the
> Most of the stuff that has been in previous Start-Up versions has been
> moved/merged into the Reference Guide.
> Files having been added from old Start-Up:
> * xml/inst_yast2.xml
> * xml/yast2_hw.xml
> * xml/yast2_sound.xml
> * xml/yast2_scanner.xm
> * xml/newbie_bash.xml
> * xml/newbie_perm_i.xml
> * xml/newbie_bash_commands_i.xml
> * xml/nm.xml
> * xml/nm_kde.xml
> * xml/nm_gnome.xml
I have just given a new user (who as got his system a bit ruined) a link to:
> Have I only not been able to find the passages in the new Reference or
> the new Startup or do you think something like it is not more
> I would doubt that it would be really wise to drop basics like that
It does not fit into the Reference Guide anymore, because that guide
assumes you already know about the basic Linux concepts, so I dropped
On the other hand you are right - an introduction on general Linux
concepts targeted at former Windows users would be a good thing to have.
Please file an enhancement bug for 11.5, Component Documentation and
assign it to me ([hidden email]).
Frank Sundermeyer, Technical Writer, Documentation
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
Tel: +49-911-74053-0, Fax: +49-911-7417755; http://www.opensuse.org/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
"Reality is always controlled by the people who are most insane" Dogbert
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
Re: openSUSE 11.4 manuals ready for translation / 11.4 changes
Am 10/03/11 13:11, schrieb Frank Sundermeyer:
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:27:24 +0100 pistazienfresser (see profile) wrote:
>> I have just given a new user (who as got his system a bit ruined) a
>> link to:
>> openSUSE Start-Up > Chapter 6. Basic Concepts
>> Have I only not been able to find the passages in the new Reference or
>> the new Startup or do you think something like it is not more
>> I would doubt that it would be really wise to drop basics like that
> It does not fit into the Reference Guide anymore, because that guide
> assumes you already know about the basic Linux concepts, so I dropped
> On the other hand you are right - an introduction on general Linux
> concepts targeted at former Windows users would be a good thing to have.
> Please file an enhancement bug for 11.5, Component Documentation and
> assign it to me ([hidden email]).
I have seen that you (singular/pl.?) have made a great improvement in
the manuals - in quantity and as far as I guess/rate also in quality.
Sorry that I left out the more or less obvious.
And probably your time and power is limited.
Maybe the dropped texts could be treated a bit alike to the staging part
of the kernel code?
What do you think about releasing it to the/pasting it in the wiki and
hope for some other people to keep it up to date?
In that case you may refer to that pages in the book-like-documentation.
On the other hand: Coming from the jurisprudence
(as one of the German "Geisteswissenschaften" but also being in Germany
always related to existing/possible cases of use)
and having been a bit in love with mathematics I tend to believe that
you should define the basics (like conceps) to be able to work with the
more specific issues (and vis versa).
So if you are writing about special things like polkit1/policy kit would
it not make sense to have a basics passage to refer to in order to avoid
to much duplication but also to give an hint why the user/admin should
go that a bit more complicated way and not just start the program as
root or with full root previleges?
The reasons why some use sodo or su- and some just su may also fit in a
more conceptual guide/manifest/...
Are the security guys not thinking about concepts and something more or
less fitting in them if they
have to decide about a package been included in a distribution or not
have to decide about a default setup of a distribution
have to decide about a concret setup of a server or desktop?
What you know what they think about that issue/these issues and where
and how it would best placed?