Re: SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
On Friday 04 August 2006 00:19, John Andersen wrote:
> On Thursday 03 August 2006 14:01, Ted Harding wrote:
> > As we know, the proportion of spam junk in the list
> > archives is high. For example, out of almost 400 messages
> > this month, some 175 are spam (44%).
> Not true.
> They say SPAM in the subect due to some overly aggressive tagging by the
> list hosting machine. But they are not in fact spam. Look at them
> and you will see.
Huh? I suppose you misunderstood. ;)
As I understand it, Ted is talking about spam in the list's *archives*, not
about spam in list's *emails we get sent*.
(BTW, you're correct about SPAM in the Subject, but, as you might understand
now, that's a different subject :P)