[PATCH] show full package name and its arch with title tag

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[PATCH] show full package name and its arch with title tag

Dinar Valeev
Hi,
Some times package name doesn't fit to monitor build progress and
doesn't show at all whether it is 32bit or 64bit build.

Following patch adds that information. (to see full package name and
its arch, you should hover mouse over the build job).

Have fun,
Dinar

0001-show-full-package-name-and-its-arch-with-title-tag.patch (1K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [PATCH] show full package name and its arch with title tag

Stephan Kulow-3
On 31.01.2012 19:21, Dinar Valeev wrote:
> Hi,
> Some times package name doesn't fit to monitor build progress and
> doesn't show at all whether it is 32bit or 64bit build.
>
> Following patch adds that information. (to see full package name and
> its arch, you should hover mouse over the build job).

Why is arch special? It doesn't show the project and repository either.
With the full info as title I agree, the architecture seems less
interesting to me. This seems to be a special ppc vs. ppc64 thingy :)

Greetings, Stephan

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [PATCH] show full package name and its arch with title tag

Dinar Valeev
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Stephan Kulow <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 31.01.2012 19:21, Dinar Valeev wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Some times package name doesn't fit to monitor build progress and
>> doesn't show at all whether it is 32bit or 64bit build.
>>
>> Following patch adds that information. (to see full package name and
>> its arch, you should hover mouse over the build job).
>
> Why is arch special? It doesn't show the project and repository either.
> With the full info as title I agree, the architecture seems less
> interesting to me. This seems to be a special ppc vs. ppc64 thingy :)
Well the project and the repository can be easily added.

There is nothing ppc special ;) I just wanted to know from monitor
page, is build stuck for 32 or 64 build? and parsing link with the
eyes if tough

>
> Greetings, Stephan
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [PATCH] show full package name and its arch with title tag

Dinar Valeev
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Dinar Valeev <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Stephan Kulow <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 31.01.2012 19:21, Dinar Valeev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Some times package name doesn't fit to monitor build progress and
>>> doesn't show at all whether it is 32bit or 64bit build.
>>>
>>> Following patch adds that information. (to see full package name and
>>> its arch, you should hover mouse over the build job).
>>
>> Why is arch special? It doesn't show the project and repository either.
>> With the full info as title I agree, the architecture seems less
>> interesting to me. This seems to be a special ppc vs. ppc64 thingy :)
> Well the project and the repository can be easily added.
Should I rewrote the patch? What kind of information we can put there?

>
> There is nothing ppc special ;) I just wanted to know from monitor
> page, is build stuck for 32 or 64 build? and parsing link with the
> eyes if tough
Also It will show probably arm builds on x86 machines. So that's
definitely not ppc specific thing
>
>>
>> Greetings, Stephan
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]