Intentional flatpak downgrade (was: New Tumbleweed snapshot 20170810 released!)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Intentional flatpak downgrade (was: New Tumbleweed snapshot 20170810 released!)

Robert Munteanu
Hi,

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Dominique Leuenberger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>   flatpak (0.9.1 -> 0.8.7)

Was this intentional? Same question was asked at [1] but did not get
any reply so I'm curious about the reason.

Robert

[1]: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/511902

--
http://robert.muntea.nu/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Intentional flatpak downgrade (was: New Tumbleweed snapshot 20170810 released!)

Mykola Krachkovsky
неділя, 13 серпня 2017 р. 00:04:51 EEST Robert Munteanu написано:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Dominique Leuenberger <[hidden email]>
wrote:
> >   flatpak (0.9.1 -> 0.8.7)
>
> Was this intentional? Same question was asked at [1] but did not get
> any reply so I'm curious about the reason.
>
> Robert
>
> [1]: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/511902

Hi,

I believe reason is on original downgrade:
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/511713

--
Kind regards,
Mykola Krachkovsky
--
Найкращі побажання,
Микола Крачковський

signature.asc (499 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Intentional flatpak downgrade (was: New Tumbleweed snapshot 20170810 released!)

Robert Munteanu
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Mykola Krachkovsky <[hidden email]> wrote:

> неділя, 13 серпня 2017 р. 00:04:51 EEST Robert Munteanu написано:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Dominique Leuenberger <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>> >   flatpak (0.9.1 -> 0.8.7)
>>
>> Was this intentional? Same question was asked at [1] but did not get
>> any reply so I'm curious about the reason.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> [1]: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/511902
>
> Hi,
>
> I believe reason is on original downgrade:
> https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/511713

Makes sense, thank you.

Robert


--
http://robert.muntea.nu/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Intentional flatpak downgrade (was: New Tumbleweed snapshot 20170810 released!)

Peter Suetterlin
In reply to this post by Robert Munteanu
Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Dominique Leuenberger <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >   flatpak (0.9.1 -> 0.8.7)
>
> Was this intentional? Same question was asked at [1] but did not get
> any reply so I'm curious about the reason.

Yes, made me curious, too.  Especially as all the 2000+ lines of changelog of
the package didn't give much insight there....

(might be a good idea to limit the number of lines the script uses of the
changelog of a package?)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Intentional flatpak downgrade (was: New Tumbleweed snapshot 20170810 released!)

Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 14:00 +0100, Peter Suetterlin wrote:

> Robert Munteanu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@sus
> > e.de> wrote:
> > >   flatpak (0.9.1 -> 0.8.7)
> >
> > Was this intentional? Same question was asked at [1] but did not
> > get
> > any reply so I'm curious about the reason.
>
> Yes, made me curious, too.  Especially as all the 2000+ lines of
> changelog of
> the package didn't give much insight there....
>
> (might be a good idea to limit the number of lines the script uses of
> the
> changelog of a package?)
I filed this as an issue a couple hours ago: https://github.com/openSUS
E/osc-plugin-factory/issues/1052

Cheers,
Dominique

signature.asc (201 bytes) Download Attachment
Loading...